>Instead of downloading the srpm why not just run rpm -q --changelog postfix | less and read that? Nice, it looks like it's not backported. I looked at an rpm I _know_ is backported (xen 303) and it's easy to grep for the possibility as they call it out! I guess I don't have Postfix 2.4x :( Thank you everyone! jlc _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Re: Backport uncertainty
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Backport uncertainty
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:26:32 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802131508540.32212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1C8CF1EA1A5B5940B81B0710B2A4C93850BB382BB8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1202932925.11615.88.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802131508540.32212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AchufQVvGkn06Xj4RiSyH3FKnXcDiAAAMYVQ
- Thread-topic: Re: Backport uncertainty
- References:
- Backport uncertainty
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: Backport uncertainty
- From: Erek Dyskant
- Re: Backport uncertainty
- From: Tom Diehl
- Backport uncertainty
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I stop the eject of the DVD after install?
- Next by Date: RE: pvmove speed
- Previous by thread: Re: Backport uncertainty
- Next by thread: RE: Backport uncertainty
- Index(es):
 |