Scott Silva wrote: > Wasn't the samba issue something that was fairly critical, but just couldn't > be backported? Could be, I didn't catch the whole thread just a portion that talked about compatibility issues with win2k3 and vista that were too invasive to be back ported. Not sure about security related things. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Re: Apache RPM's
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: Apache RPM's
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:19:08 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <fov74e$lf0$6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <030e01c86dff$6d5e8c20$481ba460$@com> <47B2802B.5020707@xxxxxxxxxx> <E2BB8074E5500C42984D980D4BD78EF901FAFEF4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <38296.216.39.174.27.1202917467.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fov74e$lf0$6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- Apache RPM's
- From: Bob Boilard
- Re: Apache RPM's
- From: Johnny Hughes
- RE: Apache RPM's
- From: Ross S. W. Walker
- RE: Apache RPM's
- From: nate
- Re: Apache RPM's
- From: Scott Silva
- Apache RPM's
- Prev by Date: RE: Re: Apache RPM's
- Next by Date: RE: Strange performance issues under CentOS 5.1
- Previous by thread: RE: Re: Apache RPM's
- Next by thread: RE: Apache RPM's
- Index(es):
 |