on 2/12/2008 9:24 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following:
I know it is too late for this one, but I usually run long running remote commands in a screen session just in case I lose the session.But I really have a hunch that it is just a lot of I/O wait time due to either metadata maintenance and checkpointing and/or I/O failures, which have very long timeouts before failure is recognized and *then* alternate block assignment and mapping is done.One of the original arrays just needs to be rebuilt with more members, there are no errors but I believe you are right about simple I/O wait time. Going from sdd to sde: # iostat -d -m -x Linux 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 (host) 02/12/2008 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rMB/s wMB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sdd 0.74 0.00 1.52 42.72 0.11 1.75 86.41 0.50 11.40 5.75 25.43 sde 0.00 0.82 0.28 1.04 0.00 0.11 177.52 0.13 98.71 53.55 7.09 Not very impressive :) Two different SATA II based arrays on an LSI controller, 5% complete in ~7 hours == a week to complete! I ran this command from an ssh session from my workstation (That was clearly a dumb move). Given the robustness of the pvmove command I have gleaned from reading, if the session bales how much time am I likely to lose by restarting? Are the checkpoints frequent? Thanks! jlc
-- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
