Milton Calnek wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
Hi there,
Should the IP address supplied be the actual address for eth0 rather
than the network address?
ie 192.168.0.1/24 rather than 192.168.0.0/24
I dunno...
what does 192.168.0.1/24 mean?
this one is not always accepted.
what does 192.168.0.0/24 mean?
this is the correct one.
The way I see it, they both mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255.
yes, but the first version is not accepted by all software. because no
IP will satisfy
bin(ip) & 0xffffff00 = bin(192.168.0.1)
anyway, I have a samba setup with
interfaces = 192.168.10.0/24
and it works. so this is not the source of the problem.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
