Re: RAID Hot Spare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:11 -0800, nate wrote:
> Dean Maluski wrote:
> > I've googled this question without a great deal of information.
> 
> > Of couse will be creating RAID0 swap but leaving that out of the
> > question for obvious reasons.
> 
> You really should use anything but RAID 0 for swap. If you need
> to swap and that device is dead then your system is hosed.
> 
> At one point I read that you can get RAID0-"like" performance
> by having multiple swap partitions on multiple devices and mounting
> them with the same priority(mount option pri=(some number)). It
> (was/is) supposed to stripe the swap partitions. Not sure if that
> ever worked, though I have configured systems over the years to
> use matching swap priorities, never really looked to see if it
> was doing what I expected though.
> 
> Yeah, from swapon(2):
> [..]
> If two or more areas have the same priority, and it is the
> high-est priority available, pages are allocated on a
> round-robin basis between them.
> 
> nate
OK, not really an answer to my hot spare question.
What I read sounds similar to what you state that if you create multiple
swap partions the system will create a raid0 of it.
So what is the recommendation? create 1 swap partition on one drive?

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux