On Jan 30, 2008 4:01 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 8:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 at 10:18am, Johnny Hughes wrote
> > >
> > >> Bent Terp wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Has something changed with regard to the mount options? We use
> > >>> (rw,noatime,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,udp,context="system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0)
> > >>>
> > >>> which has worked fine until now.
> > >>
> > >> I am trying to duplicate your options ... and noatime is not a valid
> > >> option.
> > >>
> > >> Could you please double check the /etc/export options again so I can
> > >> try to duplicate the issue.
> > >>
> > >> Using my standard /etc/exports on 2 i686 test platforms I have no
> > >> problems at all.
> > >>
> > >> Here are the options I used on my test:
> > >>
> > >> (rw,insecure,sync,no_subtree_check)
> > In any event, I can not duplicate the problem with an nfs export on c4
> > or c5 and connecting with a c5 client, regardless of the kernel using i686.
>
> One other person has reported seemingly the same nfs problem in the
> Scientific Linux mail list:
>
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0801&L=scientific-linux-devel&T=0&P=5427
>
> According to this post, "It only seems to affect x86_64 systems, or affects them
> much more noticeably than it does i386 ones."
This problem does not seem to be associated with specific hardware as
implied in the original thread. The person on the SciLinux mail list
has Dell machines, and I was able to confirm the issue using custom
built boxes. I have added a note in the bug tracker at:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635
Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
