Re: Ques about 5 vs. 3 in CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 13:14 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > I don't know if I'm brain damaged this A.M. or what, but I can't figure
> > (recall?) why this summary says CentOS 5 in the "Today's Topics", has
> > "el5" and "centos.3" as well in the md5sum.
> > 
> > Gentle chides for being dense this morning are accepted.
> 
> Hmm? I don't really understand your question.
> 
> Old version was 2.2.3-6.el5.centos.1, new version is
> 2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 - it's just naming.

AHA! In my early morning decaffeinated state, I kept thinking of
"CentOS-3" when I saw "centos.3". I looked and looked at it and finally
decided I'd ask.

Thanks Ralph!

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ralph
> <snip sig stuff>

-- 
Bill

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux