Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 7:49 AM, Ross S. W. Walker
> <rwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a 5.1 system with Xen installed. The package says
> 3.0.3, but an 'xm
> > info' shows 3.1.
> >
> > So what is it? Is it 3.0.3 patched to 3.1 or is it 3.1
> packaged as 3.0.3?
> > And if it's the former, does anybody have any idea why
> upstream wouldn't
> > just deploy 3.1 (now 3.1.2) which is more stable?
> >
>
> It is 3.0.3 with patches that would have been 3.0.4 but became 3.1.
> when 5.0 was being put together.
>
> The 3.1.x might occur as a technology preview in 5.2 but only after
> making sure that an overnight update isnt going to break someones 10k
> Xen box hosting site.
Thanks for the confirmation.
I hope they move it forward a little quicker then that it's already
kind of dated now and it could use some of the memory management fixes
in the 3.1.x branch.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
