Re: Expandable network storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi Thomas,

On Dec 17, 2007 10:56 AM, Bleier Thomas <Thomas.Bleier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm currently thinking about similar configurations, and (also for cost
reasons :-) am also thinking about GNBD with two standard servers as a
"poor man" redundant storage - but I'm wondering if that gives enough
performance for running databases (in my case Oracle) on top of it. The
configuration I'm thinking about would be two current Dell servers with
hardware RAID 10 and connected by a dedicated 1 GBit crossover-cable,
running both the cluster software and Oracle.

It depends on the number of queries and how they use the indexes, this will generate the I/O that may or may not be too much for a poor man's solution.
 
Does anyone use this in "real-World" scenarios and has some practical
experience with it?

I'm afraid I don't have a practical experience.


- Nicolas

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux