> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us:
>
> > Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the
> > version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4.
> >
>
> rpm -qa --queryformat "%{epoch}:%{name}-%{release}-%{version}.%{arch}" openoffice*
>
> I bet they have an epoch of 0, but the 2.0.4 packages have an epoch of 1,
> which means they are newer, even though the version number is smaller.
>
They work like the 2.0 version from before, meaning the same bug I moved to 2.3 to avoid.
So, I guess I'll put in an exclude until something else changes.
Thanks.
mhr
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
