FYI, no difference with noacpi and noapic. Errors this time indicated a different sector, but we'll try with a different SATA disk just to eliminate that as a possibility. Ray _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- From: Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:03:57 -0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <475D8868.5070306@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20071210182647.GA1514@xxxxxxxx> <475D85C0.3060209@xxxxxxxxx> <20071210183633.GB1610@xxxxxxxx> <475D8868.5070306@xxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
- References:
- Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- From: James A. Peltier
- Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- From: James A. Peltier
- Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- Prev by Date: Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- Next by Date: RE: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- Previous by thread: Re: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- Next by thread: RE: Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
- Index(es):
 |