> From: Ray Van Dolson
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:25:32PM -0800, Lopez, Denise wrote:
> >
> > My boss is a little concerned about the differences since
> we host production
> > servers that require minimal downtime.
> >
>
> We typically continue to use RHEL for production stuff, and CentOS for
> anything non-critical. Not that CentOS wouldn't make a solid
> production server.
>
We use centos for "all" servers which do not "require" a support plan from
Red Hat. I wonder what would happen if we purchased a support license for a
centos box after the fact?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Sr. Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you
have received it in error, purge the message from your system and
notify the sender immediately. Any other use of the email by you
is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
