Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



R P Herrold wrote:

> Rex Dieter replied:
>> If you can identify particular cases where collaboration, as
>> outlined in the above policy draft, was not followed, I will
>> personally break out a can of whoop-ass, and work to fix
>> things.
>>
>> Remember too, collaboration is a two-way street.
> 
> I never got a reply on my attempts in their court (both ML and
> IRC), which itemized several matters, chapter and verse -- I
> decline to pollute centos waters, where community works speak.

Please, I only want things to be better (and world peace, and a pony), and
that can't happen unless folks can out particular cases where collaboration
failed (esp on the epel side), so that I can I can try to help.

In the meantime, I'll go digging on epel's list searching for posts made by
you.

-- Rex

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux