Re: Re: yumex in CentOS 5.1 "extras" repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



--- Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> > Scott Silva wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't understand the question. I am currently
> using 2.0.2 from EPEL
> >>> which is the latest official version mentioned
> in yumex site, and
> >>> 2.0.3 is the yumex version available in fedora
> core 9. Why don;t you
> >>> use 2.0.2 at least, but 2.0.1?
> >> If you want the newest code available, you should
> be installing
> >> Fedora. If you want a stable server OS you
> install CentOS, or pay for
> >> support and install RHEL.
> > 
> > No, I like stability too, that's why I am using
> CentOS. However 2.0.x
> > releases are bug fixes, not new releases.
> 
> True, and they do address bugs, and we may upgrade,
> but not all people
> DO follow the move to 2.1.x or 3.x.x for all abi
> changes, etc.
> 
> So, the bottom line for all of these things are, if
> I don't see problems
> in bugs.centos.org that are affecting someone's
> ability to use a product
> ... and if it seems to be working as is ... then it
> probably will not be
> upgraded.
> 
> But, there may updates.
> 
> Again, other than a new version is released, what is
> the compelling
> reason to upgrade. :D
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
Because i want to go through the torture of an upgrade
and bug you to help me get out of the hole i just dug
for myself.
</sarcasm>

:-D
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux