On Dec 5, 2007 5:24 AM, fred smith <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But I don't remember getting a huge bolus of updates, which is what I would > have expected to constitute a 5.0==>5.1 transition. For a minimal install, there were surprisingly few new packages for 5.0 => 5.1. Looking at my /var/log/yum.log, I only had 90 packages updated or installed.Total installed packages now is 277. Jeff _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- From: "Jeff Larsen" <jlar310@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:04:22 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20071205112404.GA22039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20071204164428.GA20213@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47561041.2000606@xxxxxxxxx> <20071205112404.GA22039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- From: fred smith
- Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- From: Karanbir Singh
- Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- From: fred smith
- yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- Prev by Date: Re: weird load values
- Next by Date: Re: Need a blog server
- Previous by thread: Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- Next by thread: Re: yum update for 5.0 ==> 5.1
- Index(es):
 |