Re: Silly question about 5.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Curt Micol wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Yes, there is a bug open for this, listed here:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481

IT'S ON PURPOSE, IT'S A FEATURE, NOT A BUG :-)

> 
> On Dec 3, 2007 2:30 PM, David G. Miller <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1 kernel, etc.  One
>> oddity I noticed is that the contents of /etc/redhat-release still says:
>>
>> [root@bend etc]# cat /etc/redhat-release
>> CentOS release 5 (Final)
>>
>> but:
>>
>> [root@bend etc]# rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/redhat-release
>> centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
>>
>> On my CentOS 4 box, /etc/redhat-release says:
>>
>> [dave@fraud ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
>> CentOS release 4.5 (Final)
>>
>> Shouldn't /etc/redhat-release on the CentOS 5 box say "5.1?"
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave
>>
>> --
>> Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
>> -- Ambrose Bierce
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux