On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:04:29PM -0800, Rogelio alleged: > On 12/1/07, Garrick Staples <garrick@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Your original email had a "lib64" path, implying that had a 64bit machine, > > which if you were manually installig 32bit packages would explain everything. > > I'm sorry for the confusion. My original email was quoting the FAQ on > Perfparse's documentation, not reflecting my box's output > > > 'uname -m' will tell you if have 32bit or 64bit OS. Don't guess. > > uname -m -> i686 (as does /proc/cpuinfo). > > > No, nothing special needs to be done other than having the correct devel > > packages installed. I suspect you've got things mucked up at this point. > > I'm sorry, I'm confused. When I run "rpm -q", I get all i386 packages > (for everything on that box). The 64 bit stuff was not* installed. Ok, no more 32bit vs. 64bit confusion on my part. > The problems started occuring when another admin "yum remove" 'd gd > and gd-devel, which also removed all Nagios related stuff. I yum > installed Nagios, and when I went to configure, I got this libgd > unuseable error. > > Before this snafu, my problem was related to make, not related to > configure. Now I've gotta fix this problem with configure before I > can go back and figure out what my problem was before. > > As far as I know, this is a corrupt package issue, and I'm hoping that > there is fairly non-disrputive way of reinstalling everything required > for PerfParse. config.log has the actual error that will tell us the problem.
Attachment:
pgps1cNiyfBIZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
