On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
License. The FAQ says that this really doesn't matter, the License says
otherwise. And I tend to "believe" Licenses, because that's what you
have ...
There aren't a lot of lawsuits over software because all
responsibilities are always disclaimed away anyway -
One is sufficient to impair CentOS; Les, make a contribution
of $10k$ and we'll get a formal opinion. If that is
unappealing, tender along a update patch for the bottom of the
CentOS wiki page Java installation instructions (the top
still works just fine). Absent deeds, words are empty.
Anyway - as long as the opennms guys have it, it doesn't matter.
Thre is plenty of trolling and people offering casual legal
opinions at 24x7 in debian-legal for many years, and
presently in fedora-adv for the last couple days.
-- Russ Herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
