Re: Re: Site about qmail (with CentOS as SO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Scott Silva wrote:

No. But we had that stuff rather regularly with samba - their first line
of support seems to be : "Upgrade your version to the most current one,
then ask again."

That's what I meant.

That is very common with applications. They don't back patch old versions, and the problem you ask about might be already fixed. Just look at the dovecot list. People still pop in and ask why 0.99 has this problem, because that is what their distro came with, but they are currently at 1.0.5, and have 1.1 in beta. Who has the time to backport fixes to old versions if you don't get paid for it?

And what's the point even if you do get paid? The problem is really in distributions that by policy won't do a version level app upgrade even in instances where it would clearly be better than patching the beta version they chose to include.

--
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux