On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: > I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: > > "Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when > upstream has released it for all the versions?" > It has been released to CentOS-3 on Oct 7th, in the updates repository. The other maintainers have their own schedule/priorities. <offensive mode> Making CentOS a reality is not our daily job/duty, remember? </offensive> > The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on > Oct. 9). <troll mod activated> No one prevents you for switching distribution. </troll> > Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security > updates"? Speaking for CentOS-3, the enhancements used to go to the fasttrack repo, ie pending updates for the next point release. Since CentOS-3.9 is the last respin, all the RHEA are now in updates. > > True, the guys from SL have only released tzdata-2007h in "fastbugs" -- which > is something you should not use --, but I am asking in a single place: why? Ask on the SL mailing list, we can't speak for them! Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
Attachment:
pgpP0cSxkttNq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
