Re: Replacing failed software RAID drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



In article <47098D7B.9020104@xxxxxxxxx>,
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The only tricky part is what happens to the drive names if you boot with 
> /dev/sda broken (depending on the failure mode) or missing.  If the 
> controller doesn't see it, all of the other drive names will shift up. 
> This normally won't affect md device detection, but you may have a non 
> md device mentioned in /etc/fstab, especially for swap devices.

I normally put swap on a /dev/mdN device too. I have seen different people
say you should and you shouldn't, but my reasoning is this: if I have swap
just on raw partitions, e.g. /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2, what happens if a
drive dies while running programs are partly swapped out to the failed
drive? I expect at least that the programs would die, and at worst I might
get a kernel panic.

But if I am swapping to /dev/md2 that contains /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 in
a RAID1 mirror, the swapped-out data is preserved on a drive failure, and
the programs should be able to keep running.

Swapping to /dev/mdN certainly seems to work fine, but I haven't yet had
a drive failure to test!

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux