Re: Re: rolling your own kernel - guidelines?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 10/4/07, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These systems will be minimal installs - even less than the default
> minimal that can be achieved via Anaconda, plus a couple custom
> packages. Think - home-made appliances, or sorts. There will be very,
> very few things running on these machines.
>
> The problem with kernel 2.6.18 is that netfilter has the old (I mean,
> current) braindead conntrack that is loaded when NAT is used.
> Now, configure pktgen full blast over a gigabit link, small UDP packets,
> set it to generate random source IPs (DDoS simulation) and point it to a
> Linux router with conntrack loaded, and you'll see why I can't use the
> default kernel.
>
> Apparently there will be improvements in that regard in 2.6.23, and I've
> heard that 2.6.24 will actually be able to do 1:1 NAT without conntrack.
> --
> Florin Andrei

As pointed out earlier, whether or not a vanilla kernel runs with no
issues would depend on what else is running on the system, and there
are people who have been compiling and using a newer kernel for one
reason or another.  You can find one such example in this CentOS forum
post by Lenard who has been helping those who need to compile newer
kernels:

http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=10001&forum=37&post_id=32063#forumpost32063

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux