Simon Banton wrote:
>
> At 09:24 -0400 2/10/07, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >Actually the real-real fix was to use the 'deadline' or
> 'noop' scheduler
> >with this card as the default 'cfq' scheduler was designed
> to work with
> >a single drive and not a multiple drive RAID, so it acts as
> a govenor on
> >the amount of IO that a single process can send to the
> device and when
> >you do multiple overlapping IOs performance decreases instead of
> >increases.
>
> Ah - that wasn't actually a complete fix Ross, but it did give a
> noticeable improvement in certain situations. I'm still chasing a
> real real 'general purpose' fix.
I was unaware of that. I thought changing schedulers did it.
What is the recurring performance problem you are seeing?
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
