Or another way of putting it: nothing makes files disappear faster than fat. Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:37:34 To:"CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Silly question - Anything faster than rm? For deleting performance. When it comes to deleting files, fat seems fairly quick. Geoff Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:14:48 To:CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Silly question - Anything faster than rm? On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 07:14:54PM +0000, gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Go with fat16 or fat32 instead of ext3fs. For performance??? -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
