On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 06:22 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On 9/21/07, Scott McClanahan <scott.mcclanahan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:46 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > On 9/20/07, Yuji Tsuchimoto <nox@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Dear Yagi-san, > > > > > > > > > I heard from the horse's mouth that the CentOS team is working on the > > > > > 100Hz centosplus kernel. I think your request triggered the action :-) > > > > > They want make people happy. > > > > That sounds nice! > > > > This TIPS, CONFIG_HZ=100, is one of FAQs. It will make most of us happy. > > > > > > > > Now we can get kernel-vm package on dev.centos.org. > > > > Is it a test release of the special kernel? > > > > I installed the kernel-vm. Its change-log shows HZ=100. > > > > And the kernel seems better for clock interval on VMWare. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Yuji > > > > > > Tsuchimoto-san, > > > > > > Yes, they are in testing. Some of us have been running the 100HZ > > > kernel for more than 2 months and have not seen any problem so far. > > > If you wish to know more details about the development of the > > > virtualization-optimized kernel, please take a look at: > > > > > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 > > > > > > And feel free to add any comments you have on that report. > > > > > > Akemi > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Will the only deviation from the base/updates kernels be the decreased > > number of timer interrupts? Thanks. > > Yes, that is the only difference between the standard kernel and > kernel-vm. We do have a CentOS 5 i686 UP version which gives slightly > better performance than the default SMP. But this is not an official > version. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent Not sure if this was mentioned earlier in the thread but I just watched a session from vmworld and they commented that more recent releases of the linux kernel set CONFIG_HZ=250. Can anyone comment on the truth to that and how relative it is to the CentOS distro? Thanks. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos