I mistyped..hardware raid is the way to go. FRIAD will perform worse
than Linux software raid most times..:)
Feizhou wrote:
William Warren wrote:
actually it'll perform WORSE in many cases than Linux software raid.
Used to (bar buggy firmware, incompatibilities). Most hardware raid
cards nowadays not only have sufficient processing power, they also come
with decent sizes of RAM cache which helps swing things a lot in their
favour.
If the load goes beyond what the card can handle, then yes, Linux
software raid is the way to go.
Scott Silva wrote:
gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx spake the following on 9/21/2007 2:43 AM:
Exactly how much throughput are you realistically anticipating?
What connection are you going to use? 802.11 or 10/100 or gige?
And yes, the chips will pretty much always give you better
performance with raid.
Hardware raid gives better performance. Both of those are
"fakeraid".It won't perform any better than software raid.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
-- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"
CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician)
Linux user #322099
Machines:
206822
256638
276825
http://counter.li.org/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
