Re: Central file server advice please

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



My one piece of advice, coming from experience, is to buy a hardware RAID card from a reputable manufacturer, i.e. 3ware, Adaptec, LSI. I personally recommend 3ware, and have 10+ in various servers here in the office. The $200-$600 dollars you will spend will be well worth it if something ever should happen. You can swap out cards, and the raid array will be recognized, you can swap out drives on the fly, and they all support the newer RAID 6 for even better redundancy (I like RAID10, but I am paranoid). 3ware has amazing utilities for monitoring the array, either via the linux CLI, or via a secure web interface (nice when you use SSH port forwarding). It will send you an email when any errors occur (configurable detail levels) so this helps provide peace of mind. I can't stress how important a dedicated hardware RAID card is, regardless of the brand.

Just my .02


On Sep 21, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 at 10:58pm, John Bowden wrote

I have a Gygabyte GA-7N400 PRO2 with a 2.6 mHz Athlon cpu. I want to set up a central file storage for 2/3 users using 6/7 machines. A mixture of win2k, XP and various Linux distros (my home network). It will be used to store files,
(docs, music and DVD ) for all of these machines, print server, (two
ink-jets), mail server and later on a myth tv set up. Would SAMBA be the
best option for the file and print serving ?

Samba for file serving, CUPS for print serving -- both Win2K and XP can handle IPP.

The mother board has 2 X IDE channels, 2 X IDE channels with raid and 2 X SATA raid channels, that's up to 10 hard drive devices. The IDE raid chip is a GigaRaid IT8212F chipset. It supports raid 0 or raid 1 and raid 0 + 1 and JBOD. The SATA raid is a Silicon Image Sil3512. It supports Raid 0 or 1. Would I get better speed performance using the chips to manage the raid or
using software raid?

Without digging out the specs of those cards, I'd lean heavily towards software RAID, mainly for ease of management and compatibility.

--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
UCSF
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux