I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show > DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does > seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering > pings and nameserver requests. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 = DEVICE=eth0:0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 = DEVICE=eth0:1 ... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- From: Barry Brimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:34:58 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <46EAE16F.9070703@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <46EAE16F.9070703@xxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- From: Ray Leventhal
- Re: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- References:
- question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- From: Ray Leventhal
- question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64
- Next by Date: Re: Segmentation fault YUM
- Previous by thread: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- Next by thread: Re: question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x
- Index(es):
 |