R P Herrold wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > Just to make sure, is the /tftpboot directory set to perms 777? > > Not that that parent directory (/tftpboot) requires (or should > ever have) anything like that to work > > -- why the voodoo suggestion? Because if you are allowing any old anonymous user to write to that directory then why would one care if you only allowed group 'nobody' to write there? You could set it to 755 and create a 'cisco' dir underneath with 777, but I would leave that for when it's working. Chances are though everything under /tftpboot is subject to modification and /tftpboot will need to be a separate volume to protect against DoS through filling up the disk drive. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos