On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:07 -0400, William Warren wrote: > I run selinux in permissive. Once i figure out how to write policy i'll > put it back on active..<G> > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On 01 September 2007, William Warren > > <hescominsoon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Message: 3 > > <snip> > > > >> you can also go with webmin to configure this stuff..<G> > > > > If you use Webmin, at this time, it is probably not a good idea to use > > SELinux with it. I have a very recent thread about this and there is a > > bug on Webmin. The SELinux folks are aware of it. Below is about > > SELinux. Lanny > > > >> This explanation and description of the problem are fine. We probably > >> need a custom policy for webmin to allow iptables to write to scripts > >> running as webmin, since catching stderr is important. There is no > >> file context that can be set to allow this. As I recall from the > >> original bug report, iptables was also trying to communicate with > >> another open file descriptor. This one I beleive should be closed on > >> exec. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > Using audit2allow you should be able to take the SELinux denied messages and convert them into a policy. I've done that for syslog-ng in the past. -- Timothy Selivanow <timothys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Linux System Administrator EasyStreet Online Services, Inc. http://www.easystreet.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos