On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:18:29 -0400, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/22/07, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:25:07 -0400, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> > On 8/22/07, Paul Griffith <paulg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I didn't see anything that would indicate it (the patch) would work
with
> kernel 2.6.9. I was hoping I didn't have to split up my kernel
versions,
> for example a supported CentOS kernel for servers and a unsupported
kernel
> for the clients that have the lastest and greatest hardware. I was
going
> to give 2.6.9 a quick try and if that didn't work, then go to 2.6.18
which
> is the base for CentOS 5.
I took a quick look at the 2.6.9 source code. That patch would not
work for this kernel.
I also checked the Centos 5 kernel (2.6.18-8.x). The patch you
referred to will not work there either. However, I saw a test kernel
available from upstream that already has that fix applied. So, there
is some good chance that CentOS 5.1 will have it. Given the fact you
need it by early September, this may not work out either.
Akemi
Thank You for the help!!
In the meantime we will get a SATA DVD drive to test with CentOS 4.5. If
anything changes I will post under this thread.
Thanks Again,
Paul
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
