On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 17:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > <snip> P.S. I make (the possibly invalid assumption) that the original directory timestamp is a valid comparator to use in seeing if the file(s) have been modified. For you case, if this is valid, the negation of the test might be needed. -- Bill _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Opposite of cp -u
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS General List <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Opposite of cp -u
- From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:04:13 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <46B79569.7050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <46B79569.7050005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Opposite of cp -u
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- Opposite of cp -u
- Prev by Date: startup config scripts for CentOS
- Next by Date: Re: "near native" performance with xen?
- Previous by thread: Re: Opposite of cp -u
- Next by thread: Re: Opposite of cp -u
- Index(es):
 |