Okay folks, I think we've just about beaten this horse long enough. Lets all agree that the whole mess needs some clarity, and that any griping on this list is not likely to resolve the issue. Can we please let this thread die now and get back to some centos related help/business? -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- From: "Jim Perrin" <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 07:17:19 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bMu8QcNxG8uIjq1/e8KIfcpswkN37Xg9LK1cBtqGQJAqwLLeOFOCbeKcNIn5UUlVMsA+Zl29pwPLRYsNvLGFiau52PGmAH1wDt/WPWwpYBqmDd5oETKf5QJab0BLfwheiJXXRFAYJ+PSNJ28aeKdTEO9kENMUCtVboCXgfvdmOc=
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707281430040.11649@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <46AA3C06.1080307@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707281430040.11649@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- From: Steven Vishoot
- Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- References:
- EPEL repo
- From: JC Júnior
- Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- From: Dag Wieers
- EPEL repo
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next by Date: Re: usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 - CENTOS 5
- Previous by thread: Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Next by thread: Re: Mixing RPMforge and EPEL (Was: EPEL repo)
- Index(es):
 |