Re: redhat-rpm-config, was: yum remove 'tomcat*'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



R P Herrold wrote:


Red Hat fixed their bug: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html I haven't seen a response to centos bugzilla 0002160 that I filed a month ago about this.

Did you look at a system before posting?  Or just shoot from the hip?

No, I installed Sun java on a Centos 5 box, noticed that tomcat didn't start, googled for the error message about the missing index and found that it was a known problem.

[herrold@centos-4 ~]$ lynx -dump http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0365.html | grep -i srpm
   SRPMS:
   SRPMS:
[herrold@centos-4 ~]$

Don't you need an up2date subscription to get that stuff?

And they have a packaged Sun Java available
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0223.html
(that's the link for rhel4 but I think there is one for 5 too).

[herrold@centos-4 ~]$ lynx -dump http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2007-0223.html | grep -i srpm
   SRPMS:
[herrold@centos-4 ~]$

no linked SRPMS

And that.

... cannot prove the fix exists to me so far. Sad that Red Hat feels it has to play these games.

If they didn't, we wouldn't need CentOS...


Johnny notes it has been updated and is in updates which have been issued over a week ago -- it is a convenience fix, and not a security matter

Yes, tomcat is very secure when it won't run at all. And yes it would be more convenient if it worked.

Les ... you have an open bug -- you think it is fixed upstream. No SRPMS are noted in teh fix release which you seemingly were able to find. The tests I did, you can do.

I don't have the up2date subscription.

Why not lend a hand and point to available source RPMs rather than carp on the mailing list on stale matters?

If you dislike non-security related updates notifications, write a tool to provide you information on the changes.

If google doesn't know, nothing I write is going to find it. This is what I found https://www.zarb.org/pipermail/jpackage-discuss/2007-June/011548.html and there have been several other threads on the jpackage list about similar issues in rpms built on FC6 and RHEL5.

But while we are sort-of on this topic, can someone explain the jpp in the rpm package names? Some of the posters on the jpackage list seem to have been confused about the source of their packages. Does jpp mean something unrelated to the jpackage repo?


--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux