On 25/07/07, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > httpd is working perfectly now. I am still not sure why httpd worked on > other installations I have done without this, but as Ralph mentioned the > certs really needed to be updated anyway. Probably because previously you don't have HTTPS enabled? -- Alvin Chang Yu-Ming _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- From: "Alvin Chang" <alvin.chang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:05:26 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VY40Q/XpdoqObxo2RRzpOs9difBpP0jUp1RnFJcyz9D5zn3ZLvYgGntUlPWn67+PrtSm8i1F76jhuUIvAUmw7XAmPm5MrN41tf4Dwu5Hnh+Anspw262HxQncZlkAy/15F5k3K//yRjaGC0ym3AGIEBT+BzrY4W8SdTwTqTq4CY8=
- In-reply-to: <1185374734.26092.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1185128552.18378.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070722202145.GD20206@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1185138762.18378.37.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1185374734.26092.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- From: Gregory P. Ennis
- Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- From: Gregory P. Ennis
- Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- From: Gregory P. Ennis
- httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- Prev by Date: Re: openoffice
- Next by Date: Re: Re: 4gb ram shows as 3.3gb
- Previous by thread: Re: httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
- Next by thread: Printer Driver 2180
- Index(es):
 |