On 7/26/07, Dave K <davek08054@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing.
That could be a problem. Thanks.
On 7/26/07, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you ever set up your own local repo, that should be given the
> highest priority. In that case, you'd better start with a 2 for base
> etc.
I'm just starting to "play with" priorities, but I actually made mine
all multiples of 10 on the first setup to make tuning easier.
Great minds think alike. I just sent a message suggesting the same thing.
Also, I think I've found that if you really want to use the "plus"
repo it needs to be the same priority as "base" and "updates".
That could be a problem. Thanks.
--
Dave K
Unix Systems & Network Administrator
Mount Laurel NJ
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Drew Einhorn
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
