> Feizhou wrote: > If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. > > http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 > > I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less. Feizhou, You could care less? Huh? Come on now Feiz you old salty dog. Your love shows, you posted to the CentOS list about it... Awwwwwwwwwwww, we love you too! :-) - rh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Bind 9 pharming security hole
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Bind 9 pharming security hole
- From: "Robert - eLists" <lists06@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:10:02 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <46A6C635.7020807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <46A6C635.7020807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcfObZzBLr7MvoWuT+e0hjxgLrJ2jwAX/UGA
- References:
- Bind 9 pharming security hole
- From: Feizhou
- Bind 9 pharming security hole
- Prev by Date: Arif Budiono/INDONESIA is out of the office.
- Next by Date: Yum missing dependency
- Previous by thread: Re: Bind 9 pharming security hole
- Next by thread: Centos as a desktop, advisable?
- Index(es):
 |