On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Dave K wrote: > On 7/25/07, Chris Mauritz <chrism@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree completely. I don't see any real showstoppers that would > > prevent it from being a fine desktop. There are a few extras that I'd > > want to grab from the Fedora repos, but you can't beat the > > cost/stability/speedy updates/7 year EOL with a stick. > > I agree, but I think the earlier comments have some validity though. > It would be far more useful if certain key apps (e.g. FireFox and > OpenOffice, I'm sure each of us has their own "key app" list) were > kept up-to-date, They are kept functional and secure. I think that is enough in many cases. If someone really needs a special app they can always compile it and/or install it in their $HOME. /Peter > perhaps in an alternative repo. And for supporting a > large deployment, they need to be a repo, building/installing manually > just isn't an option.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
