On Saturday 21 July 2007, Patrick - South Valley Internet wrote: ... > After googling around (and not finding out how to get XFS enabled in the > kernel), people had some concerns about using XFS due to issues and it > being about as fast as ext3. > > Also people said that I might run into issues with XFS if I run > NFS+lvm+xfs+md but I'm not sure if I run lvm and md and if that applies > to me. Just a few random opinions/thoughts on the topic. * more components (nfs, fs, lvm, ...) uses more stack space * xfs eats stack this is why it's not really good on 32-bit (4K stack) * performance diff vs. ext3 varies not only with work load but also with hardware * ext3 is much more widely used and wont cause you any head aches when a new kernel arrives /Peter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
