Hi Jeff
I am wrestling with the same problem. However I set the masquerading -
it just wont do it. My theory is that the user "root" is a "trusted
user" and is allowed to override outgoing email addresses. I think this
is overriding the masquerading. I suspect that the masquerading will
work for non-trusted users. Also - if I change roots "from addresss" to
eliminate the "host" then both the from " and "envelope sender" are sent
without the host. Let me know if you find a better solution.
Richard.
Jeff Potter wrote:
Since you are using NAT, the important IP address and host name
associated with it is the one the outside world sees. Does that IP
address
have a host name the world sees and does that name then resolve to
the same IP
address?
Yup -- that's what I'm trying to get sendmail to use, but it's
insisting on using the internal hostname, inclusive of the machine
name. I.e., "betsy.example.com" is the actual hostname, at 10.x.x.x;
all the 10.x.x.x machines have custom /etc/hosts that define
betsy.example.com, etc., with their 10.x.x.x IPs. When it sends email
to the outside world, I need to to send as "example.com", dropping the
"betsy" part.
Is this really that hard?
best,
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
