Re: Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Thanks for the quick reply, Jim; much appreciated :)

Cheers!

On 7/2/07, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/1/07, Eduardo Dela Rosa <eduardo.delarosa@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> Hi,

> After the completing the installation, I wanted to configure my DNS server
> but it seemed that /etc/named.conf and other stuffs in
> /var/named/chroot/var/named directory are not
> there  (i.e., *.zone, *.local, etc).
>

This is not a 'bug' or 'broken' package so to speak, but more a
concious decision by the upstream folks. See the bugzilla report here
-> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234508

> Can anyone give me idea? This is the first time that I've tried CentOS; used
> to have Fedora Core and RHEL; but I know CentOS is a RHEL fork; just don't
> know what exactly the
> other differences are.

Basically you can copy the 'example' files from /usr/share/doc/ or use
system-config-bind to set things up.

--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
Eduardo Dela Rosa
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux