Brian Mathis wrote:
On 6/26/07, Jean Figarella <jfigarella@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0.
>> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing
>> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to
>> look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)?
>
> Actually, Firefox 2.x irritates the crap out of me with the newer
> search option. Instead of /foo to search a page for foo and having the
> option to find it again, you now have to hit ctrl+f, windows style for
> searching. the /foo still works, but times out quickly and doesn't
> give you the option to move to the next found location.
>
> I'd say sit tight for a while on the RH version unless there's a
> feature/plugin you REALLY need/want.
>
you can do "/' to search, and if it does finds something the "ctrl" +
"f" and it will give you the option to find more. But I agree it is
annoying that it doesn't give you the "find next" option when using "/"
to search.
-Jean
You'll notice that Ctrl+G does a "Find Next". Always has, even in quick
find.
Sweet , thanks. that is very helpful.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
