Re: Correct xen domains path

[Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:31:30AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I've not heard a good reason to keep SELinux enabled, to be honest.
> >For high sensitivity stuff, sure (much like using SEOS on Solaris for high
> >sensitivity machines - eg those where third parties might have access).
> >But as a general rule for all machines?  Why?

> Good experience... I have had multiple webservers not have successful

Yup.  Webservers are machines where third parties might have access, and
so are candidates for enhanced security processes such as SELinux or
SEOS.

I've never said there are _no_ cases for SELinux.  I was questioning it
as a general rule for all machines.

-- 

rgds
Stephen
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos