no mbox conversion is needed. as mentioned before the only down side is that your pop users that keep mail on the server will redownload their mail as duplicates. If anyone needs the rpm for fc4 let me know. I don't think it is on the net anymore. On 6/8/07, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/8/07, Andy Wright <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > atrpms.net/el4-i386/atrpms/stable/dovecot-1.0.0-8_56.el4.at.i386.rpm Andy/Chris -- any particular issues with upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0? We have a server that's been in production for about a year with 0.99 and strores many hundreds of unix-flat-file (often so-called "mbox" format) mailboxes as well as MH-style one-message-per-numbered file mailboxes. Our Outlook users occasionally have access trouble and I'd like to try 1.0, but not if it means breaking access to any of these mailboxes or having to go through a lengthy conversion process (we have a logrotate-style archival scheme that is tied to the present file layouts so conversion is non-trivial even if there is some kind of automated way to change formats). _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
