"CentOS List" <centoslist@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Well, it does the trick for openssl-devel.. But there are other > packages which still require openssl i386. What should i do? It really depends if you need 32 bit compatibility. I tend to do "yum remove glibc.i686" to get rid of it entirely. -- Arnaud _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos openssl-devel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Centos openssl-devel
- From: Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arnaud.Gomes@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:42:40 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <062001c7a50c$8f1495b0$0201a8c0@dw> (CentOS List's message of "Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:52:19 +0800")
- References: <05f001c7a4c2$ac1d4ac0$0201a8c0@dw> <y9hhcpqpzpo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <062001c7a50c$8f1495b0$0201a8c0@dw>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Centos openssl-devel
- From: CentOS List
- Re: Centos openssl-devel
- References:
- Centos openssl-devel
- From: CentOS List
- Re: Centos openssl-devel
- From: Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale
- Re: Centos openssl-devel
- From: CentOS List
- Centos openssl-devel
- Prev by Date: Re: rar incompatiblity from 4.4 to 4.5
- Next by Date: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 28, Issue 3
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos openssl-devel
- Next by thread: Re: Centos openssl-devel
- Index(es):
 |