Ok, thanks. After you mentioned it, I checked out the website and it looked very promising. But I guess I'll stay away. Thanks Matt On 5/10/07, Tim Uckun <timuckun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/10/07, Matt Shields <mattboston@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Were you able to get this working? After seeing your email about > this, it looks like something I could use. As I said I got it kind of working. Some clients are able to log in, some are not. Some log files nothing but spaces other's don't really say anything useful. They give microsoft type of error messages like "object reference not set" or some such crap. My advice is not to bother it's just not worth your headache. I am stuck with my install because I have some users on it they have lots of data but I curse the day I chose to install this thing. Furthermore there is no community to ask for help. The developers don't answer questions, if you are really really lucky they will ask you for some logs or config files and then completely ignore you after that. Maybe one day when 3.6 finally becomes stable it will be worth looking at but that project is at least a year behind now. They promised an interim 3.5 stable release and that never materialized either, they rushed out a "developer release" but it's buggy as hell. Take my advice stay far away from this project. Use rsync, use unison, use powerfolders, use scp, use subversion use anything else but this thing. you have been warned. I have spent countless hours trying to get this thing working properly and it never had learn from my hard earned experience. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
