Re: Good things about CentOS 5; problem with flash in seamonkey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 5/2/07, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is why (multiple times on the list, and many times since you've
joined) we tell desktop users to stick with x86, even on x86_64
hardware, unless they're willing to deal with the hassle of
maintaining a multi-arch system.

It doesn't work in seamonkey or firefox.  I used
seamonkey-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm for the former, and installed the
flash-plugin-9.0.31.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm for the plugin.  It doesn't
show up on either browser's list of plugins, and I've tried rpm -ivh
and rpm -Uvh, even with --force.  Nada.

As for the notes about previous warnings on this subject, I was hoping
that something might be DIFFERENT in CentOS 5 in this regard, but
clearly not.  (Thanks a lot, RHEL.)

Again, this is something that I had working in CentOS 4.4 that no
longer works.  Disappointing.

--
Mark Hull-Richter, Linux Kernel Engineer
DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com)
85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA  92656
949-680-3082 - Office     949-330-7691 - fax
Ask me about CentOS Linux, and escape from Windows forever!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux