On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 08:55 -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >Dave,
> >
> >I would guess that this is not in there ... but I will double check and
> >see if we can get it rolled in.
> >
> >I should be in the CentOS-5 module though.
>
> It's going to be awhile before we'll be ready to upgrade that host to CentOS
> 5, so I'm looking at either getting a different xfs module for c4 or switching
> the partition back to ext3.
>
> So that I understand what I'm installing for c5, will the CentOS 5 xfs module
> for the mainline ("compatible with upstream") kernels be based on the
> in-kernel source, or will it be a replacement module (as in CentOS 4)? How
> about the centosplus kernels?
>
The modules will be compiled separately ... however early testing is not
going well on the i386 distro there either.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
