On 4/18/07, Mark Hull-Richter <mhullrich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It would really best to supply the whole host.domain in the file for > > the entry. Since you also have 2 different networks, sendmail may be > > having trouble figuring out what the server really is. The 192.168 > > address resolves differently than the 69.234 address. And the 69.234 > > address doesn't reverse to the same name set in /etc/hosts. This > > confusion can very much cause sendmail to get all turned around and > > stall. You might want to consider looking at your logs to see if you > > have errors reflecting this.
I did both this and took Scott's advice (to leave my machine name off the localhost line) and the sendmail and sm-client now start just fine (fast).
> > Are you using the stock drivers or the proprietary nForce chipset drivers?
I couldn't find any sata drivers from nVidia, just video drivers. However, I did notice that when I put a new sata drive in to replace the defective one, smartd was happy and quick once again. I thought maybe there was a bad entry in the smartd.conf file, but that drive isn't in there at all (I'll be adding it once it passes a preliminary badblocks screen - so far so good). The new drive is a WD320 - a little smaller (and cheaper), but it seems to be running quite a bit better already.... -- Mark Hull-Richter, Linux Kernel Engineer DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 949-680-3082 - Office 949-330-7691 - fax _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
