-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:17:00PM -0700, centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > When I am looking for a package that does not exist under rhel5, > is it better to get rhel4 or fc6? Get RHEL5 and install the fc6 package on it. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJW3NpdyWzQ5b5ckRAj3sAJ9VvJB08KLqVOVMl6ZcFhDFxbya7ACfZeaR ClkRiP8B6a1iBjs4tJ0QH+8= =4zT5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos5 compatibilities
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Centos5 compatibilities
- From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:01:01 -0300
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20070417171700.1a6ffe44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20070417171700.1a6ffe44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
- References:
- Centos5 compatibilities
- From: centos
- Centos5 compatibilities
- Prev by Date: Re: ATI radeon X300
- Next by Date: Re: Centos5 compatibilities
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos5 compatibilities
- Next by thread: Re: Centos5 compatibilities
- Index(es):
 |